Research in Progress: Clarence Thomas vs. Anita Hill | Operant Subjectivity

PDF

Published: 1992-04-02

Dan Thomas

Craig McCoy

Abstract

N/A

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 3 (1992)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Research in Progress: Clarence Thomas vs. Anita Hill. (1992). Operant Subjectivity, 15(3). https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/osub/article/view/9038

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Robert Leonard, Daniel Sunblad, Dan Thomas, Attribution and Ideology in American Politics: Causal Reasoning, Political Cognition, and Partisan Polarization in the Age of Trump , Operant Subjectivity: Vol. 42 (2020)
Dan Thomas, Allen McBride, Larry Bass, Contrary Convictions: Race and Subjectivity in Public Opinion on the O.J. Simpson Criminal Trial , Operant Subjectivity: Vol. 19 No. 3/4 (1996)
Dan Thomas, Larry R. Baas, Probing the Subjective Communicability of an Unfolding Presidential Scandal: A Q Study of the Clinton/Lewinsky Affair , Operant Subjectivity: Vol. 25 No. 2 (2002)
Dan Thomas, Taking Subjectivity Seriously in Educational Outcomes Assessment , Operant Subjectivity: Vol. 22 No. 4 (1999)