Applying UAS Technologies at Night during a Wildlife Hazard Assessment

Main Article Content

Janelle Drennan
Raymond Ayres
Jose Cabrera
Flavio Antonio Coimbra Mendonca
Ryan Wallace

Abstract

Airports operating under the Code of Federal Regulations Part 139 should conduct a wildlife hazard assessment (WHA) when some wildlife-strike events have occurred at or near the airport. The WHA must be conducted by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist (QAWB). The required elements in a WHA include the identification of the wildlife species observed and their numbers and the location of features on and near the airport that could attract wildlife. The collection of data pertaining to mammal populations during a WHA is generally time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. Protocols to collect this data include trapping and marking animals and systematic surveys using a spotlight and/or night vision equipment. The purpose of this study was to investigate how UAS technologies could be effectively applied to streamline the QAWB efforts during a WHA at night. Researchers, including students, used a DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual with visual and thermal cameras and a spotlight, as well as a Matrice 210 with a Zenmuse XT2 thermal camera to collect data. Data were collected in a farmland area located two nautical miles south of Daytona Beach International Airport. We applied multiple strategies to mitigate the risks associated with drone operations in an airport environment. The safe application of UAS to streamline the WHA process is anticipated to provide several benefits to the airport operator, including task completion in reduced time, enhanced level of accuracy during the data collection process, reduced risks for the QAWB, and cost efficiencies. Most importantly, researchers expect to develop benchmark safety protocols that can facilitate the effective integration of UAS into the airport environment.

Article Details

Section
Proceedings

References

Cabrera, J., Chimino, A., Woolf, N., Schwarz, M., & Mendonca, F. A. C. (2021). Applying UAS for wildlife hazard management at airports. FAA challenge: Smart airport student competition. http://faachallenge.nianet.org/wp-content/uploads/FAA_ 2021_TechnicalPaper_EmbryRiddleAeronauticalUniversity.pdf.

Dolbeer, R. A., Begier, M. J., Miller, P. R., Weller, J. R., & Anderson, A. L. (2023). Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States: 1990-2022 (Serial Report Number 29). https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/Wildlife-Strike-Report-1990-2022.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2018). Protocol for the conduct and review of wildlife hazard site visits, wildlife hazard assessments, and wildlife hazard management plans (AC 150/5200-38). https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150-5200-38.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2020). Hazardous wildlife attractants on or near airports (AC 150/5200-33C). https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/ 150-5200- 33C.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2023, June 4). Air traffic activity system (ATADS): Airport operations. FAA. https://aspm.faa.gov/opsnet/sys/airport.asp

Hamilton, B. A. (2020a). Airports and unmanned aircraft systems Volume 1: Managing and engaging stakeholders on UAS in the vicinity of airports (ACRP Research Report No. 212, volume 1). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://www.nap.edu/ catalog/25607/airports-and-unmanned-aircraft-systems-volume-3-potential-use-of-uas-by-airport-operators

Hamilton, B. A. (2020b). Airports and unmanned aircraft systems Volume 3: Potential use of UAS by airport operators (ACRP Research Report No. 212, volume 3). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://www.nap.edu/ catalog/25607/airports-and-unmanned-aircraft-systems-volume-3-potential-use-of-uas-by-airport-operators

Hamilton, B. A. (2020c). Airports and unmanned aircraft systems Volume 2: Incorporating UAS into airport infrastructure planning guidebook (ACRP Research Report No. 212, volume 2). National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://www.nap.edu/ catalog/25607/airports-and-unmanned-aircraft-systems-volume-3-potential-use-of-uas-by-airport-operators

Mendonca, F. A. C., Keller J., & Huang, C. (2020). An analysis of wildlife strikes to aircraft in Brazil: 2011-2018. Journal of Airline and Airport Management, 10(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3926/jairm.160

Misra, S., Toppo, I., & Mendonca, F. A. C. (2022). Assessment of aircraft damage due to bird strikes: A machine learning approach. International Journal of Sustainable Aviation, 8(2), 136–151. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJSA.2022.122328.

Pfeiffer, M. B., Blackwell, B. F., & DeVault, T. L. (2018). Quantification of avian hazards to military aircraft and implications for wildlife management. PloS one, 13(11), e0206599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206599

Tella, T. D., A. & Mendonca, F. A. C (2023). Safety management of wildlife hazards to aviation: An analysis of wildlife strikes in Part 139 airports in Florida 2011-2020. [Manuscript accepted for publication]. College of Aviation, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.