An Exploration of the Relationship Between Flight Simulator Performance and Achievement of Solo Flight Among Australian Aviation Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
University flight training programs are becoming an increasingly important avenue for developing ab initio pilots, yet training programs suffer high attrition rates. Flight simulators are commonly used by university flight schools as a training aid, and the purpose of this research is to understand if student performance using a Personal Computer-Based Aviation Training Device (PCATD) is a relevant predictor of student success as measured by the achievement of flying solo in university flight training. To investigate this, 195 students at an Australian university from 2018 to 2021 were subject to comprehensive flight simulator instruction via a PCATD prior to flight training, with simulator performance correlated to flight training success. This sample was split into international and domestic students, with the PCATD performance of each group correlated to the achievement of the first solo and the number of flight hours to the first solo, respectively. Results suggested that international students who achieved the first solo had better simulator performance on average than those who did not. However, a statistically significant relationship was unable to be observed between flight simulator performance and flight time to achieve solo flight amongst domestic students.
Article Details
References
Baugh, B. S., & Stolzer, A. J. (2018). Language-Related Communications Challenges in General Aviation Operations and Pilot Training. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics and Aerospace, 5(4), 8. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2018.1271
Bjerke, E., & Healy, M. (2010). Predicting student persistence: Pre-entry attributes that lead to success in a collegiate flight program. Collegiate Aviation Review, 28(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100399
Childs, J. M., & Spears, W. D. (1986). Flight-Skill Decay and Recurrent Training. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.62.1.235
Emery, B. (2011). Neurocognitive predictors of flight performance of successful solo flight students [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://access.library.unisa.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/docview/912202569?accountid=14649
Ennis, E. A. (2009). The evolution of simulation in aviation flight training [Master’s thesis, California State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/dissertations-theses/evolution-simulation-aviation-flight-training/docview/305181151/se-2?accountid=14649
Goetz, S., Harrison, B., & Voges, J. (2015). The use of FAA flight training and aviation training devices at UAA institutions. Collegiate Aviation Review, 33(1), 44-59. http://www.uaa.aero/docs/Spring_2015_CA.pdf
Hoermann, H. J., & Goerke, P. (2014). Assessment of social competence for pilot selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 24(1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.860843
Jones, C. A. (2013). The relationship between academic performance and pilot performance in a collegiate flight training environment [Master’s thesis, Middle Tennessee State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/dissertations-theses/relationship-between-academic-performanceand/docview/1437198712/se-2?accountid=14649
Lutte, R. K., & Mills, R. W. (2019). Collaborating to train the next generation of pilots: Exploring partnerships between higher education and the airline industry. Industry & Higher Education, 33(6), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219876472
Martinussen, M., & Hunter, D.R. (2017). Aviation psychology and human factors (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315152974
McDermott, J. T. (2005). A comparison of the effectiveness of a personal computer-based aircraft training device and a flight training device at improving pilot instrument proficiency: A case study in leading regulatory change in aviation education [Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/dissertations-theses/comparison-effectiveness-personal-computer-based/docview/305028534/se-2?accountid=14649
McFarland, M. R. (2017). Student Pilot Aptitude as an Indicator of Success in a Part 141 Collegiate Flight Training Program [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1492088859648498
Mekhail, A., Niemczyk, M., Ulrich, J. W., & Karp, M. (2010). Using the table reading test as an indicator for success in pilot training. Collegiate Aviation Review, 28(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100404
Olson, R. B. (2002). An analysis of student progress in beginning flight training: Performance prediction, performance measurement, and performance improvement [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/dissertations-theses/analysis-student-progress-beginning-flight/docview/276006610/se-2?accountid=14649
Page, R. L. (2000). Brief history of flight simulation. SimTecT 2000 proceedings (pp. 11–17). SimTecT 2000 Organising and Technical Committee. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.132.5428&rep=rep1&type=pdf
United States Government Accountability Office. (2014). Aviation workforce: Current and future availability of airline pilots (GAO-14-232). https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-14-232.pdf
Vaden, E. A., Westerlund, K. K., Koonce, J. M., & Lewandowski, W. (1998). The Use of a Personal Computer-Based Aviation Training Device in Ab Initio Flight Training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42(20), 1374–1377. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129804202002
Zierke, O. (2014). Predictive Validity of Knowledge Tests for Pilot Training Outcome. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 4(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000061