Certificated AMTs: What Will Encourage More Women to Become Aviation Maintenance Technicians?
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines practices that are used in STEM fields to attract women. According to the FAA, the estimated active mechanic certificates held as of December 31, 2020 was 306,301. Of those 306,301, it is estimated that 7,860, or 2.5%, were held by women. In 2009, there were 329,027 active mechanics certificates held, and 6,980 or 2.1% were held by women. There was a steady growth of certificated women mechanics from 2009 through 2015 – growing from 2.1% to 2.5%, respectively. In 2016, there was a drop to 2.3%. The percentage for 2017 and 18 was 2.4%. In 2019, the number increased from 2.4% to 2.5%, with a slight increase to 2.56% in 2020. With the increased need for AMTs, it is imperative to determine best practices for engaging women in Science, Technology Engineering, Aviation, and Math (STEAM) fields. There is limited data available specific to women in the aviation maintenance fields. What is known is that in 2018, women earned more than half of all bachelor’s degrees in science and engineering fields. Women earned 42.3% of bachelor’s degrees in mathematics and statistics and 22.2% of bachelor’s degrees in engineering in 2018. Conversely, in 2018, the number of certificated women aviation mechanics was 2.4%. What is drawing women to the fields of mathematics, statistics, and engineering? Can those methods be successful in attracting women to the field of aviation maintenance? Examining the tactics used in STEM disciplines may lead to successful practices to increase the number of women AMTs.
Article Details
References
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: AAUW.
Benoff, D. (2002, December). Ms. Mechanic: It's not a traditional career path for women, but for those who like a mechanical challenge, aviation maintenance can be just the thing. Business & Commercial Aviation, 91(6), pp. 66-68.
Catalyst. (2019, June 14). Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Quick Take. Retrieved from Catalyst: https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/
Dennehy, T. a. (2017, June 6). Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964-5969. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613117114
Estrada, M. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 206-222. doi:10.1037/a0020743
Federal Aviation Administration. (2019, February 4). U.S. Civil Airmen Statistics. Retrieved from Federal Aviation Administration: https://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation_data_statistics/civil_airmen_statistics/
Federal Aviation Administration. (2021, May 19). U.S. Civil Airmen Statistics. Retrieved from Federal Aviation Administration: https://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation_data_statistics/civil_airmen_statistics/
Hawkes, S. (2020). 20th Century: Who Was Rosie the Riveter: The American Factory women of World War II. Retrieved from U.S. History Scene: https://ushistoryscene.com/article/rosie-the-riveter/
Hayes, S. (2018). Engaging Girls in STEM: Three things middle level educators can do to encourage more girls to engage in STEM. AMLE Magazine, 6(2), 26-28.
Hernandez, P. B. (2017, November 1). Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187531
Hughes, J. N. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student-each and student-peer relatedness: Efficacy on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 278-287. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005
Jagacinski, C. M. (2013). Women Engineering Students: Competence Perceptions and Achievement Goals in the Freshman Engineering Course. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69, 644-657. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0325-9
Mills, J. A. (2010). Gender Inclusive Engineering Education. New York, New York: Routledge.
Mullen, A. L., & Baker, J. (2018). Gender Gaps in Undergraduate Fields of Study: Do College Characteristics Matter? Socius. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118789566
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019, March 8). Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. doi:nsf19-304
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2021, April 21). Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables
Robnett, R. a. (2017, July 17). STEM success expectancies and achievement among women in STEM majors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 91-100. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.07.003
Rossi, A. S. (1965). Women in science: Why so few? Social and psychological influences restrict women's choice and pursuit of careers in science. Science, 148, 1196-1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3674.1196
Sarseke, G. (2017). Under-Representation of Women in Science: From Educational, Feminist, and Scientific Views. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11, 89-101. doi:10.1080/19407882.2017.1380049
Settles, I. O. (2016). Climate Perceptions and Identity Interference Among Undergraduate Women in STEM: The Protective Role fo Gender Identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(4), 488-503. doi:10.1177/0361684616655806
The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine. (1997). Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/5789/chapter/2