Resilience Attributes of Certificated Flight Instructors

Main Article Content

David Cross
Kristine Kiernan

Abstract

The aviation industry has extensive vocabulary, data sources, and theoretical models to investigate human errors. However, the industry does not have commensurate ways to think about and analyze human success. Learning from successful routine operations is challenging because the corresponding common language and data streams are less robust. This paper explores the use of the critical incident debrief method to collect data on routine resilient performance among Certificated Flight Instructors (CFI). CFI thoughts and behaviors were coded in accordance with resilience theory. The critical incident debrief method is a valuable source of data for exploring resilient performance as it provides researchers with insights into CFI thoughts and intentions that may not be observable through their behaviors. CFI performance can be analyzed through the lens of resilience theory, but coding reliability remains a challenge

Article Details

Section
Peer-Reviewed Articles

References

Broderick, S. (2021). American Airlines expanding unique pilot-observation program. Aviation Week Intelligence Network. http://www.aviationweek.com

Chen, X., Liu, X., & Qin, Y. (2019). An extended HFACS based risk analysis approach for human error accident with interval type-2 fuzzy sets and prospect theory. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 8381-8395. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190929

da Silva, L. M. A., & Nunes, R. (2019). Heading towards adaptive behavior in aviation training. Gestão & Produção, 26(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X3507-19

deSant'Anna, D. A. L. M., & deHilal, A. V. G. (2021). The impact of human factors on pilots’ safety behavior in offshore aviation companies: A Brazilian case. Safety Science, 140, 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105272

Erjavac, A. J, Iammartino, R., & Fossaceca, J. M. (2018). Evaluation of preconditions affecting symptomatic human error in general aviation and air carrier aviation accidents. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 178, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.021

Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.). Line operations safety assessment (LOSA). https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/losa/

Glavan, B., Peterson, N, Scheidel, G., Jefferies, C., & Kwasny, J. (2021). Charting a new approach: What goes well and why at American Airlines. Flight Safety Foundation.

Holbrook, J., Stewart, M., Smith, B., Prinzel, L., Matthews, B., Avrekh, I., Cardoza, C. T., Ammann, O. C., Adduru, V. & Null, C. H. (2019). Human performance contributions to safety in commercial aviation. NASA Langley Research Center. NASA/TM2019-220417

Hollnagel, E. (2011). RAG – The resilience analysis grid. In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. D. Woods, & J. Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience engineering in practice. A guidebook (pp. 274-275). Taylor and Francis Group.

Hollnagel, E., Pariès, J., Woods, D. D. & Wreathall, J. (2011) Resilience engineering in practice. A guidebook. Taylor and Francis Group.

ICAO (2021). ICAO safety accident statistics. https://www.icao.int/safety

Jefferies, C., Glavan, B., Peterson, N., Kwasny, J., Mouton, G., Scheidel, G., & Blakin, E. A. (2020). Trailblazers into Safety-II: American Airlines’ learning and improvement team. Allied Pilots Association and American Airlines.

Kelly, D., & Efthymiou, M. (2019). An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017. Journal of Safety Research, 69, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009

Kiernan, K. (2019). In focusing on what pilots do wrong, we may be missing valuable lessons from what they quietly do right. Forbes.com.

Kiernan, K., Cross, D., & Scharf, M. (2020). Developing a taxonomy for success in commercial pilot behaviors. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.20.100203

Landman, A., Groen, E. L., van Paassen, M. M., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Mulder, M. (2017). Dealing with unexpected events on the flight deck: A conceptual model of startle and surprise. Human Factors, 59(8), 1161-1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817723428

Leveson, N. (2020). Are you sure your software will not kill anyone? Communications of the ACM, 63(2), 24-27.

Lower, M., Magott, J., & Skorupskib, J. (2018). A system-theoretic accident model and process with human factors analysis and classification system taxonomy. Safety Science, 110(A), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.015

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). Aviation reporting system. https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/

Ohlander, U., Alfredson, J., Riveiro, M., & Falkman, G. (2019). Fighter pilots’ teamwork: A descriptive study. Ergonomics, 62(7), 880-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1596319

Oster, C.V., Strong, J., & Zorn, K. (2013). Analyzing aviation safety: Problems, challenges, opportunities. Research in Transportation Economics, 43(1), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.12.001

Rankin, A., Woltjer, R., & Field, J. (2016). Sensemaking following surprise in the cockpit- A re-framing problem. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18, 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0390-2

Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2017). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Routledge.