From Classroom to Industry: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Decision-Making

Main Article Content

Bettina Mrusek
Stephanie Douglas

Abstract

The presence of human factors in aviation remains a critical area of research given the safety implications of human error.  Understanding what specific factors contribute to human error allows managers and operators to take steps to mitigate these hazards.  Several methods have been tested in the cockpit and cabin crew environments, but less attention has been given to the aviation maintenance sector, despite the prevalence of accidents resulting from human error.  With the introduction of AC-172A, the FAA validated the need for additional research and training on the role of human factors in aviation maintenance errors.  However, a key component in this process is often overlooked--the role of decision-making. In aviation maintenance, the environment can change rapidly.  Technicians must react and adjust their behavior, and their decision-making abilities, accordingly.  Human factors such as fatigue, pressure, and distractions can interrupt cognitive processes and judgment, and in turn, decision-making.  As technicians adapt to these environmental challenges, strategies must be in place to facilitate optimal decision-making.  Recommendations for addressing the presence of human factors in aviation maintenance and the resulting impact on the decision-making process include taking both a proactive and reactive approach to human error identification.  Proactively screening for individuals who are too risk-averse or too comfortable with taking risks can help hiring managers employ the right personnel equipped to make appropriate decisions in high consequence industries, such as aviation.  Additionally, by encouraging and reviewing hazard reports, steps can be taken to mitigate human error factors in the future.  Anonymous hazard reporting tools such as the REPAIRER allow maintenance managers to leverage existing (and FAA-required) safety management systems (SMS) by including a human factors analysis. 

Article Details

Section
Position Papers
Author Biographies

Bettina Mrusek, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Assistant Professor, Department of Aeronautics Undergraduate Studies

College of Aeronautics

Stephanie Douglas, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Assistant Professor, Department of Technology and Management

College of Business

References

Allerton, D. J. (2002).The case for flight simulation in general aviation. Aeronautical Journal, 106, 607-612.

Alrabghi, A. & Tiwari, A. ( 2016) A novel framework for simulation-based optimisation of maintenance systems. International Journal of Simulation Modeling, 15(1), 16-28.

Ballard, S. (2014). The U.S. commercial air tour industry: A review of aviation safety concerns. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 85(2), 160-166. doi:10.3357/ASEM.3814.2014

Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2014). Shared leadership in multiteam systems: How cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(2), 270-286. doi:10.1177/0018720813488137

Cassens, R.E., Young, J.P., Greenan, J.P., & Brown, J. (2018). Elements related to teaching pilots aeronautical decision making. The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 29(1)

Chan, M., & Singhal, A. (2013). The emotional side of cognitive distraction: Implications for road safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 147-154.

Dekker, S.W.A. (2015). The danger of losing situation awareness. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17, 159–161

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0320-8

Dupont, G. (1993) The Dirty Dozen Errors in Maintenance, Human Error in Aviation Maintenance (pp. 49-52). Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from: https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/library/documents/media/mx_faa_(formerly_hfskyway)/human_factors_issues/meeting_11/meeting11_7.0.pdf

Federal Aviation Agency (2016). Safety Management System order 8000.369B. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/FAA_Order_8000.369B.pdf

Federal Aviation Agency (2017). Advisory Circular 120-72A, Maintenance Human Factors Training. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-72A.pdf

Federal Aviation Agency (1991). Advisory Circular 60-22, Aeronautical Decision Making. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/22624

Federal Aviation Agency Safety Team (n.d.). ALC-107: Dirty Dozen – Human error in aircraft maintenance training. Retrieved from: https://www.faasafety.gov/gslac/ALC/course_content.aspx?pf=1&preview=true&cID=107

Ford, J., Henderson, R., & O'Hare, D. (2014). The effects of crew resource management (CRM) training on flight attendants' safety attitudes. Journal of Safety Research, 48, 49-56. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.11.003

Graeber, R. C., Marx, D. A. (1994). Human Error in Aircraft Maintenance, Aviation Psychology in Practice, 87-104.

Harris, D., & Li, Wen-Chin (2016). Decision Making in Aviation.. Routledge.

International Civil Aviation Organization (1993). Circular 240-AN/144. Human Factors Digest No. 7, Investigation of Human Factors and Incidents. https://www.icao.int/isbn/Lists/Publications/DispForm.aspx?ID=308

Kaempf, G. L., & Orsanu, J. (1997). Current and future applications of naturalistic decision making in aviation. In C.E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 81-90). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Kearns, S. K., & Aitken Schermer, J. (2017). Survey of attitudes toward aviation safety management system (SMS) training: Impact of gender and national culture. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 7(1), 1-6. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000109

Klein, G. A.(1993). A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making. In G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. (pp. 138-147). Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C.E. (1993). Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Ku, M., MacDonald, R.H., Andersen, D.L., Andersen, D.F., & Deegan, M. (2016). Using a simulation-based learning environment for teaching and learning about complexity in public policy decision making. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(1), 49-66.

Latorella, K. A., & Prabhu, P. V. (2000). A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26(2), 133-161. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(99)00063-3

Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press.

Li, W.C. & Harris, D. (2008). The evaluation of the effect of a short aeronautical decision-making training program for military pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18(2), 135-152.

Madsen, P., Dillon, R. L., & Tinsley, C. H. (2016). Airline safety improvement through experience with Nearâ€Misses: A cautionary tale. Risk Analysis, 36(5), 1054-1066. doi:10.1111/risa.12503

Marais, K. B., & Robichaud, M. R. (2012). Analysis of trends in aviation maintenance risk: An empirical approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 106, 104-118. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.003

Marquardt, N., Treffenstadt, C., Gerstmeyer, K., & Gades-Buettrich, R. (2015). Mental workload and cognitive performance in operating rooms. International Journal of Psychology Research, 10(2), 209.

Mattila, V., Virtanen, K., & Raivio, T. (2008). Improving maintenance decision making in the Finnish Air Force through simulation. Interfaces, 38(3), 187-201, 222-223

Miller, M., & Mrusek, B. (2018, July). The REPAIRER Reporting System for Integrating Human Factors into SMS in Aviation Maintenance. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 447-456). Springer, Cham.

Peksatici, O. (2018). Crew resource management (CRM) and cultural differences among cockpit crew - the case of turkey. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education and Research, 27(2), 1. doi:10.15394/jaaer.2018.1742

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242

Prabhu, P., Drury, C.G. (1992). A framework for the design of the aircraft inspection information environment. In: Proceedings of the Seventh FAA Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Rashid, H. S., Place, C. S., & Braithwaite, G. R. (2013). Investigating the investigations: A retrospective study in the aviation maintenance error causation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15(2), 171-188. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0210-7

Rose, F. D., Attree, E. A., Brooks, B. M., Parslow, D. M., Penn, P. R., & Ambihaipahan, N. (2000). Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics, 43(4), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184378

Samad, A., Johari, M., & Omar, S. (2018). Preventing human error at an approved training organization using Dirty Dozen. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 71-73. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21332

Schore, A. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. Routledge, New York, NY.

Strauch, B. (2016). Decision errors and accidents: Applying naturalistic decision making to accident investigations. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 10(3), 281-290.

Stokes, A., & Kite, K. (1999). Grace under ï¬re: The nature of stress and coping in general aviation. In D. O’Hare (Ed.), Human performance in general aviation (pp. 47–85). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate

Stolzer, A. J., Friend, M. A., Truong, D., Tuccio, W. A., & Aguiar, M. (2018). Measuring and evaluating safety management system effectiveness using data envelopment analysis. Safety Science, 104, 55-69. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.037

Taylor, A., Dixon-Hardy, D.W., & Wright, S.J. (2014). Simulation training in U.K. general aviation: An undervalued aid to reducing loss of control accidents. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 24(2), 141-152.

Thomas, M. (2017). Training and assessing non-technical skills: A practical guide. CRC Press

United States Department of Transportation (1926). Air Commerce Act. Retrieved from: https://www.transportation.gov/content/air-commerce-act

Valentin-Marian I., & Venera, C. (2016). Limitations of systemic accident analysis methods. INCAS Bulletin, 8(4), 167-174. doi:10.13111/2066-8201.2016.8.4.14

Van Horenbeek, A., Pintelon, L. & Muchiri, P. (2010). Maintenance optimization models and criteria. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-011-0045-x