Low-Cost Airline Pilots on Exercising Fuel-Loading Policies Designed to Minimize Carrying Extra Fuel during Flight: A Phenomenological Exploration Study

Main Article Content

Dr. Nurettin Dinler
Dr. Nithil Bollock Kumar
Dr. Gajapriya Tamilselvan
Dr. Stephen Belt

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore low-cost carrier (LCC) pilots’ lived experiences of exercising their airlines’ fuel-loading policies designed to minimize carrying extra (discretionary) fuel during flight. Using a phenomenological approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with seven Part 121 LCC pilots in the United States. Participants were recruited through purposive snowball sampling, and the data were analyzed using Creswell’s (2013) data analysis spiral. Participants described FAA oversight and the joint responsibility between captains and dispatchers as important aspects of their airlines' fuel-loading policies designed to minimize extra fuel. However, many expressed concerns that such policies reduced the range of options available in unexpected operational situations. Participants also described additional workload and time pressure associated with calculating, requesting, and justifying additional fuel, particularly during delays and disruptions. Overall, the findings suggest that conservative fuel-loading policies may be experienced as a source of psychological stress and highlight the challenges pilots face in balancing fuel-efficiency objectives with operational demands.

Article Details

Section
Peer-Reviewed Articles
Author Biographies

Dr. Gajapriya Tamilselvan, Saint Louis University

Dr. Gajapriya Tamilselvan is an Assistant Professor in the Oliver L. Parks Department of Aviation Science, School of Science and Engineering at Saint Louis University. She is a passionate teacher and researcher in aviation safety, human factors, and training. She is also a faculty advisor for research projects at the Aviation Learning, Education, and Performance (AVLEAP) Laboratory. 

Dr. Stephen Belt, Saint Louis University

Dr. Belt is a Professor and Chair of the Oliver L. Parks Department of Aviation Science at Saint Louis University. His research focuses on collegiate aviation education, academic administration and assessment, flight instructor development, and learner-centered pedagogical approaches, including Ignatian pedagogy.

References

C.F.R. § 121.639 (2026). Fuel supply: All domestic operations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-G/part-121/subpart-U/section-121.639

C.F.R. § 121.645 (2026). Fuel supply: Turbine-engine powered airplanes, other than turbo propeller: Flag and supplemental operations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-G/part-121/subpart-U/section-121.645

Ates, S. S., Kafali, H., & Kilicoglu, G. C. (2018). Reducing operational fuel costs of airlines: A model for monitoring and managing fuel consumption using unified modeling language. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 14(1), 105–111.

Cho, Y. H., Lee, J. O., Song, B. H., & Yoo, K. E. (2020). A study on reducing fuel uplift for fuel-efficient flight operations by LCCs and new airlines. International Journal of Sustainable Aviation, 6(3), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSA.2020.112204

Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC). (2013). Positive taxonomy report: Line operations. https://www.transportes.gob.es/recursos_mfom/pdf/C46487F8-F0AB-43F3-BF69-C5C2DB26CA50/141796/REPORTTAXONOMYLINEA.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

Cullen, P., Cahill, J., & Gaynor, K. (2021). A qualitative study exploring well-being and the potential impact of work-related stress among commercial airline pilots. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000199

De Winter, D. (2013). Commercial pressure. SKYbrary. https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2350.pdf

Durgut, M. (2022, April 19). Pegasus Airlines Sabiha Gokcen accident – February 5, 2020. Aviation File. https://www.aviationfile.com/pegasus-airlines-sabiha-gokcen-accident/

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). (2016). Notice of proposed amendment 2016-06 (C): Fuel planning and management. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/notices-of-proposed-amendment/npa-2016-06-c

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2016). OpSpec B343, performance-based contingency fuel requirements for flag operations (Notice N 8900.383). U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/notice/n_8900.383.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2022). Risk management handbook (FAA-H-8083-2A). https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/risk_management_handbook_2A.pdf

Goh, Y. M., Love, P. E. D., Brown, H., & Spickett, J. (2012). Organizational accidents: A systemic model of production versus protection. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00959.x

Goose Recruitment & Flight Global. (2020). The pilot survey 2020. https://www.goose-recruitment.com/the-pilot-survey-2020-report

Hao, L., Hansen, M., & Ryerson, M. S. (2016). Fueling for contingencies: The hidden cost of unpredictability in the air transportation system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.02.016

Harris, D. (2011). Human performance on the flight deck. Ashgate.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2012). Flight planning and fuel management manual (Doc 9976, Advanced unedited ed.). https://www.fly19.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Doc-9976-Flight-Planning-and-Fuel-Management-Manual.pdf

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2018). Annex 6 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Operation of aircraft (11th ed.). https://ffac.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICAO-Annex-6-Operation-of-Aircraft-Part-I-International-commercial-air-transport.pdf

Jeon, S. J., Yoo, K. E., & Yoo, S. (2022). Airline pilot perceptions and implementation of fuel saving actions. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(5), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1897908

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Ozbek, C. (2020). Is there fuel pressure on Pegasus’s pilots? Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/tr/pegasus-pilotlar%C4%B1-%C3%BCzerinde-yak%C4%B1t-bask%C4%B1s%C4%B1-m%C4%B1-var/a-52306150

Ryerson, M. S., Hansen, M., Hao, L., & Seelhorst, M. (2015). Landing on empty: Estimating the benefits from reducing fuel uplift in US civil aviation. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9), Article 094002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094002

Simsek, G. (2020). Why didn’t Pegasus’ pilots pass? Who is the fault? Haberturk. https://www.haberturk.com/pegasus-un-pilotlari-neden-pas-gecmedi-hata-kimde-haberler-2579151-ekonomi

Tabernier, L., Fernández, E. C., Tautz, A., Deransy, R., & Martin, P. (2021). Fuel tankering: Economic benefits and environmental impact for flights up to 1500 NM (full tankering) and 2500 NM (partial tankering). Aerospace, 8(2), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020037

Trincheiras, S. S. (2016). Fuel conservation strategies through flight operation optimization at PGA [Master’s thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico]. Instituto Superior Técnico Repository. https://scholar.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/records/RoVoiSBrghtyWkG_HqZfxYrNoivBABqgV4Ek

T.R. Presidential Official Gazette. (2022). Aircraft accidental research and investigation report announcement. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ilanlar/eskiilanlar/2022/03/20220305-4-10.pdf

Tursucu, E. (2022). Pegasus Sabiha Gökçen accident final accident report published. Bagimsizhavacilar. https://www.bagimsizhavacilar.com/pegasus-sabiha-gokcen-kazasi-nihai-kaza-raporu-yayinlandi/