NIMBY-TIMBY: Analysis of stakeholder perspectives on hazardous waste controversies in Oklahoma

Main Article Content

James J. Lawler

Abstract

Local opposition to unwanted hazardous waste facilities has spawned an extensive social science literature on the so-called "NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) Syndrome" (Brion 1991; Bullard 1994; Greve
1989; Morris 1994; O'Looney 1995; Rabe 1994; Rosenbaum 1998). "NIMBY," a pattern of intense citizen opposition to local sitting of risky activities or technologies (Mazmanian and Morrell 1990: 126), has been a
major obstacle to hazardous waste facility sitings throughout the United States (Brion 1991; Bullard 1994; Greve 1989; Morris 1994; O'Looney 1995; Rabe 1994; Rosenbaum 1998). NIMBYism has been variously
attributed to differences in perception of risk (Armour 1991; Kunrether, Fizgerald, and Aarts 1993: Mazmanian and Morrell 1990; Visocki and Brennan 1993), to citizen distrust of government and industry
(Hunter and Leyden 1995;Kraft and Carly 1991; Leroy and Nadler 1993, Rabe 1994}, to feelings of loss of citizen control (Edelstein 1988), and to inequities in distribution of costs and benefits (Armour 1991;
Portney 1991 ). A comparative study of six hazardous waste controversies in Oklahoma found that a lack of responsiveness by state officials to local citizen activism contributed to the NIMBY phenomenon
(Lawler, Focht and Hatley 1990)

Article Details

Section
Articles