Government Seat Pitch Regulation of Commercial Airlines: A Multi-Study of Consumer Perceptions

Main Article Content

Scott R. Winter

Abstract

Since deregulation of the airline industry in the 1970’s, the distance between seats on commercial aircraft referred to as seat pitch has been decreasing. What used to be around 35 inches has now reduced to 28-31 inches depending on the type of airline and fare class purchased. As a result, some consumer advocacy groups have filed litigation and pressed the U.S. Congress to regulate a minimum seat pitch. These advocacy groups primarily cite safety concerns in the event of an emergency evacuation of the aircraft or health concerns such as deep vein thrombosis, which can occur from extended sitting periods and cramped quarters. Counter-arguments relate to consumers price sensitivity as it relates to airfare purchases, and their ability to purchase upgrades, such as seats with greater seat pitch, for additional fees. Therefore, the purpose of these studies was to identify consumer perceptions on government involvement in airline seat pitch and to create and validate a statistical model to predict a passenger’s support of government regulation of seat pitch. The findings indicate that approximately 60% of passengers felt the government should regulate seat pitch. Perceptions of regulation value, disgust, happiness, Republican political affiliation, Hispanic ethnicity, Asian ethnicity, and high school level of education were significant predictors of support for government regulation of commercial airline seat pitch. The model explains 53.7% of the variance, and three separate, secondary assessments suggested good model fit and a valid model was produced. The practical applications of these findings are discussed.

Article Details

Section
Peer-Reviewed Articles
Author Biography

Scott R. Winter, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Dr. Scott R. Winter is an assistant professor of graduate studies at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University in 2013.

References

Akamavi, R. K., Mohamed, E., Pellmann, K., & Xu, Y. (2015). Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline business. Tourism Management, 46, 528-545.

Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., & Harris, L. (2009). Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15, 221-226.

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 3-5.

Daft, J. & Albers, S. (2012). A profitability analysis of low-cost long-haul flight operations. Journal of Air Transport Management, 19, 49-54.

Elliott, C. (2018, July 15). Airline seat standard coming, as safety concerns, passenger complaints mount. USA Today. Retrieved from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/advice/2018/07/15/airline-seat-standards-government-regulations-coming/777040002/

Francis, G., Dennis, N., Ison, S., & Humphreys, I. (2006). The transferability of the low-cost model to long-haul airline operations. Tourism Management, 28, 391-398.

Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B.C., Chabris, C.F., Chatterjee, G., & Wilmer, J.B. (2012) Is the web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 847-857.

Glusac, E. (2018, July 6). F.A.A. declines to regulate airplane seat size. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/06/travel/faa-plane-seat-size.html

Lee, D. & Luengo-Prado, M. J. (2004). Are passengers willing to pay more for additional legroom? Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 377-383.

Lijmback, W., Miehlke, P., & Vink, P. (2014, October). Aircraft seat in- and egress differences between elderly and young adults. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Chicago, Illinois.

Kim, Y. K. & Lee, H. R. (2011). Customer satisfaction using low cost carriers. Tourism Management, 32, 235-243.

Koklic, M. K., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Vegelj, S. (2017). An investigation of consumer satisfaction with low-cost and full-service airline companies. Journal of Business Research, 80, 188-196.

Kremser, F., Guenzkofer, F., Sedlmeier, C., Sabbah, O., & Bengler, K. (2012). Aircraft seating comfort: The influence of seat pitch on passengers’ well-being. Work, 41, 4936-4942.

Kuo, C. & Jou, R. (2017). Willingness to pay for airlines premium economy class: The perspective of passengers. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 134-142.

Kurtulmusoglu, F. B., Can, G. F., & Tolon, M. (2016). A voice in the skies: Listening to airline passenger preferences. Journal of Air Transport Management, 57, 130-137.

McCartney, S. (2018, July 24). When airline CEOs try the cheap seats. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-airline-ceos-try-the-cheap-seats-1532441990

Mendoza, R. L. (2017). Health risk, price efficiency, and airline seat size regulation. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(2), 122-132.

Mikulic & Prebezac, D. (2011). What drive passenger loyalty to traditional and low-cost airlines? A formative partial least squares approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17, 237-240.

Pels, E. (2008). Airline network competition: Full-service airlines, low-cost airlines, and long-haul markets. Research in Transportation Economics, 24, 68-74.

Rice, S., Winter, S.R., Doherty, S. & Milner, M.N. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of using internet-based survey methods in aviation-related research. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 7(1), 58-65.

Silk, R. (2018, August 28). Regulating size of airline seats gaining support. Travel Weekly. Retrieved from: Regulating size of airline seats gaining support. Travel Weekly

Wensveen, J. G. & Leick, R. (2009). The long-haul low-cost carrier: A unique business model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15, 127-133.